Guide to MA Ballot Question 2, Ranked-Choice Voting Initiative
Many aspects of voting have changed over the years. For the upcoming political election, one of the questions on the ballot relates directly to the voting process itself. Almost every other future election could be affected by this one.
Voters will be asked about the concept of 'ranked-choice voting.' People all over the country are used to voting systems that only give them the chance to select a single option, even if there are over two choices available. In situations where three choices where available, voters had to vote as if they fully supported one of the options. Some of those people might have had a second choice, but they were not able to make that clear on the ballot itself. If ranked-choice voting becomes standard, they'll finally be able to do so.
The people who support this policy are saying that it will eliminate some of the issues associated with the existing system. For one thing, the candidates that do get elected will now still have the support of a larger portion of voters. Plenty of candidates have been able to win in the past without being popular with the majority of Massachusetts voters.
There have been candidates who have managed to win after receiving under twenty-five percent of the vote. Situations like that are becoming difficult to avoid, since there will be races where several different candidates will want to run. If those people enter the race, they will automatically split the vote in a way that will stop people from truly having their votes make an impact.
However, there are people who disagree with this new system. They'll point out that citizens have all traditionally had one vote. A system like this stops a person from making a firm selection. Other people have said that this new system would just be challenging from a simple practical bureaucratic standpoint. After all, in order to put this sort of system into practice, the ballots will have to be taken to an additional location after the initial and more traditional voting process. This new system will be more time-consuming than the old one. Some people are concerned that more errors will occur.
It's worth noting that the ranked-choice system is not necessarily going to have an effect on every single vote that a person will make in practice. After all, during many voting decisions, only two possibilities are offered. The ranked-choice system will certainly not have an effect on presidential elections, even for the people in Massachusetts. At least three candidates will have to be competing for a single position, or this system will be purely academic.
In practice, the ranked-choice voting system is also really going to specifically make a difference when the race is very close and no candidate has much of an edge. In situations where one candidate is clearly more popular, a person's second choice is not going to matter all that much. One candidate will have to initially get fifty percent of the votes or less for ranked-choice voting to really apply significantly. Still, this voting system creates an interesting precedent that could have more of an effect across the nation.